
A bad outcome is not always malpractice. But when a provider departs from the standard of care and a patient is hurt, the burden of that injury should not fall on the family alone. We litigate against hospitals, surgical groups, and large defense firms.
The Four Elements
Every viable claim must satisfy all four. Missing any one and the case fails — which is why honest screening matters more than aggressive marketing.
A doctor-patient relationship existed and the provider owed you a recognized standard of care.
The provider failed to meet that standard — judged against what a reasonable provider in that specialty would do.
The breach actually caused the injury — established through expert medical opinion, not assumption.
Quantifiable harm: additional treatment, permanent injury, lost income, pain and suffering, or wrongful death.

Cases We Handle
Wrong-site surgery, retained instruments, anesthesia complications, post-op infection mismanagement.
Cancer, stroke, sepsis, heart attack — when the workup ignored obvious symptoms.
HIE, brachial plexus injury, untreated maternal hemorrhage, delayed C-section.
Wrong drug, wrong dose, dangerous interactions, pharmacy compounding errors.

Case Spotlight
Patient presented to a Seattle ER with classic stroke symptoms. The triage nurse downgraded the acuity. CT was ordered four hours late. Tissue plasminogen activator window was missed. Permanent right-side hemiparesis. We engaged a board-certified emergency physician and a neurologist as experts; the hospital's defense firm withdrew its initial denial four months before trial.
What Happens Next
Med-mal cases are not won at the courthouse. They are won — or lost — in the records, in the experts you retain, and in how quickly you preserve a story before the chart "completes itself."
Written preservation letters to every facility, plus a HIPAA-compliant request for the complete chart — not the summary the facility offers families.
A board-certified physician in the relevant specialty reviews the chart against the standard of care. Honest screening: most cases stop here.
If the standard was breached, we draft a detailed liability narrative and damages package. Many hospitals settle before suit when the file is trial-ready.
If the carrier refuses, we file. Depositions of the providers, the nurse-managers, and the credentialing committee follow.
Patterns We See
None of these guarantee a case. All of them justify a free record review. The earlier we look, the more options remain.
A symptom that didn't fit the diagnosis — and wasn't worked up
A delay between presentation and a critical scan or specialist call
A surgical complication explained as 'a known risk' with no second look
A medication or dose that didn't match what other providers prescribed
A discharge that happened before vital signs stabilized
A nurse or staff member who quietly suggested you 'get a copy of the records'
Interactive · 60 seconds
Reflects Washington verdicts and settlements involving hospital and provider negligence.
Med-mal damages run higher than auto cases — but require expert review to confirm liability.
Step 1 of 3
Washington Resources
Common Questions
Bad outcomes alone are not malpractice. We screen by reviewing the records with a physician in the relevant specialty. If the standard of care was met, no case exists. If it wasn't, we move forward.
Washington has a three-year statute of limitations from the date of negligence, with a one-year discovery extension and an absolute eight-year cap. Some claims involving foreign objects have separate rules.
Most cases resolve before trial. If your case does go to trial, your testimony will focus on what happened and how it changed your life — not on second-guessing medicine.
Nothing up front. Medical malpractice cases are taken on contingency. We advance the cost of expert review and litigation.
Confidential record review